You see the clip and feel the shock before anything else: a healthcare worker on video suggesting harm to a group of people, and the hospital immediately cuts ties. A nurse’s social media post advocating violent or harmful tactics went viral and led to swift termination and an active investigation.
This post unpacks what appeared in the videos, how the employer and lawmakers reacted, and why the fallout matters for professional trust and public safety. Expect a clear look at the videos’ claims, the institutional response, and the legal and ethical debates that followed.
The Viral Videos and Immediate Fallout
Staff posted videos and screenshots that spread quickly across platforms, prompting public outrage and employer action within days. Multiple clips and reposts showed inflammatory language and calls for violence, and hospital leadership moved to investigate and remove implicated employees.
Details of the Controversial Videos
Several short clips surfaced showing staff making violent comments and endorsing harm toward a public figure. One video captured graphic language advocating physical attack; another included images paired with captions normalizing brutality. Viewers rapidly shared the material, which amplified within hours on mainstream and right-leaning reposting accounts.
Hospital employees appear in multiple uploads, sometimes identified by name or uniform. The content crossed institutional conduct lines by targeting an identifiable individual and promoting illegal acts, which accelerated HR and legal review. Public reaction pressured the employer to act quickly to contain reputational damage.
Malinda Cook’s Anti-ICE Posts and Termination
Malinda Cook, identified in social posts as an anti-ICE nurse, had previously shared posts critical of Immigration and Customs Enforcement that drew attention to her political views. After the violent videos circulated, posts linking Cook to the clips prompted her employer to place her on leave and later terminate her employment, citing violation of conduct policies and threats to patient trust.
Cook’s social media history was cited in news coverage and employee statements as context for the decision. Hospital officials emphasized that political speech alone did not drive action; rather, they pointed to content that promoted violence and jeopardized the institution’s obligation to provide safe, impartial care.
Alexis “Lexie” Lawler’s Remarks about Karoline Leavitt
Alexis “Lexie” Lawler appeared in at least one clip where she made disparaging and violent remarks about Karoline Leavitt, a public political figure. The comment explicitly celebrated the idea of harming Leavitt, which triggered swift condemnation from the community and media outlets that picked up the video.
Lawler’s employer moved to investigate amid calls for disciplinary measures. Public posts and screenshots tied to her account circulated alongside the primary videos, increasing scrutiny and prompting statements from local advocacy groups demanding accountability for staff who threaten individuals because of political differences.
Role of Social Media Accounts like LibsOfTikTok
Accounts such as LibsOfTikTok played a catalytic role by reposting and amplifying the original clips to a much larger audience. These reposts framed the videos as evidence of extremist behavior within healthcare, which intensified public pressure and accelerated employer responses.
Amplification also changed the context: short-form videos originally seen by a small circle reached national audiences, prompting mainstream outlets to report and local officials to comment. The reposting accounts often added provocative captions that shaped interpretations and drove coordinated calls for disciplinary action.
Reactions, Legal Debates, and Broader Impact
The incident prompted swift institutional action, sharp public reactions across the political spectrum, and immediate talk of disciplinary and legal consequences. Responses touched on professional standards, social media policy enforcement, and whether online speech by clinicians should trigger license reviews.
Hospital and Institutional Responses
Baptist Health Boca Raton Regional Hospital moved quickly after the video circulated, conducting a review and then terminating the nurse, Lexie Lawler, for violating conduct and social‑media expectations. The hospital framed the decision around patient trust and professional standards, saying the comments conflicted with its values and expectations for caregivers.
Hospital statements stressed that healthcare workers must avoid language that suggests bias or harm toward patients or colleagues. Administrators also pointed to internal social‑media policies and potential patient‑privacy and confidentiality concerns as reasons for swift action.
Other employers and professional groups used the case to remind staff about documentation, reporting protocols, and the reputational risks of public posts. Some hospitals updated guidance or retrained teams to prevent similar incidents.
Public and Political Backlash
Reactions split largely along partisan and media lines. Conservative outlets and commentators amplified the clip and called for accountability, while some on the left debated free speech versus professional responsibility.
Karoline Leavitt, the target named in the video, drew public sympathy from many who called the post unacceptable for any healthcare professional. Social accounts like LibsOfTikTok and prominent commentators reposted the video, increasing its reach and intensifying calls for consequences.
The episode also sparked grassroots responses: supporters of Leavitt demanded apologies and repercussions, while some activists argued the firing reflected unequal enforcement of standards depending on political alignment. Online discussion frequently centered on whether a private‑sector employer acted appropriately.
License Revocation Efforts and Legal Discussion
Calls emerged for disciplinary action beyond termination, including petitions and complaints to state licensing boards seeking revocation or suspension of Lawler’s nursing license. Legal analysts noted that boards evaluate conduct that endangers public trust and may investigate statements showing potential bias or inability to provide impartial care.
Lawyers cautioned that proving a license violation often requires demonstration of harmful practice or clear violation of professional rules, not just offensive speech. Defamation or threats could prompt criminal review, but context matters: intent, pattern of behavior, and employer policies inform enforcement.
Some commentators raised First Amendment questions, but courts and boards typically allow regulation of professionals’ conduct in the interest of public safety. Observers expect licensing authorities to weigh the video, any prior complaints, and hospital findings when deciding whether to open formal disciplinary proceedings.
Relevant reporting on the firing and institutional comments includes coverage by Baptist Health and news outlets detailing the video and the hospital’s response, such as the article on the firing at Baptist Health Boca Raton Regional Hospital.
More from Decluttering Mom: