For a lot of adults, The Lion King and other big studio cartoons live in a mental file labeled “comfort viewing,” not “racial politics.” A group of Professors is trying to pry open that file, arguing that these glossy, kid-friendly stories quietly center White privilege and recycle racist cultural narratives. Their claim is not that parents are secretly indoctrinating their kids, but that Hollywood’s animated fantasies keep returning to the same power structures, even when the characters are lions, mermaids, or superheroes.
The debate lands in a media moment already thick with arguments over diversity, representation, and what children should be taught about race. By turning the spotlight on movies that feel almost sacred to a generation raised on VHS tapes and streaming queues, the researchers are forcing viewers to ask who gets to be the hero, who is coded as a threat, and what kind of world these films present as “normal.”
How a classroom favorite became a case study in White power
The new analysis, led by Professors who focus on media and race, treats animated blockbusters as political texts rather than harmless background noise. Their framework starts with blunt questions like “Do the racialized characters fulfill harmful, simplistic, or racist stereotypes?” and “Do the nonhuman characters take on racial coding that maps onto real-world hierarchies?” Those prompts, described in a recent set of questions, are meant to push teachers and students to look past catchy songs and slapstick to the deeper patterns that shape how kids imagine power and belonging.
At the center of the project is The Lion King, which the scholars treat as a kind of Rosetta stone for modern animated politics. Earlier academic work by Key on Pride Lands argues that The Lion King functions as an allegory for White resentment over immigration and perceived loss of power, with the Pride Lands standing in for a threatened homeland and the “circle of life” doubling as a defense of a rigid social order. In that reading, the film’s narrative of patriarchal restoration, where Simba reclaims his “rightful” throne, lines up neatly with political rhetoric that treats demographic change as a crisis and casts challengers to the status quo as dangerous outsiders.
From Pride Rock to Hollywood’s wider animated universe
The Professors do not stop at one film. Their broader claim is that animated Hollywood projects, from Disney staples to newer franchises, consistently promote White privilege and what they call “racist cultural narratives.” In their summary of the research, they argue that these movies tend to center White-coded protagonists, sideline characters of color, and frame social order as something that must be defended against racialized threats, even when the cast is made up of animals or mythical beings. That critique, laid out in a detailed argument, explicitly links The Lion King to other titles like Into the Spider-Verse, which are praised for diversity on the surface but, in the researchers’ view, still operate inside a White-centered storytelling frame.
The project’s authors describe their work as an analysis, not a casual opinion piece, and they fold in themes that go well beyond race. Their materials, highlighted in an overview of the, flag immigration enforcement, capitalism, climate change, and even food chains where “human eats nonhuman species” as recurring motifs that naturalize hierarchy. In that sense, the critique of White privilege is part of a larger claim that animated Hollywood, as a system, keeps teaching kids that some groups are meant to rule, others are meant to serve, and the environment itself is there to be managed by those at the top.
The backlash, the deeper scholarship, and what happens in the classroom
Predictably, the study has drawn sharp pushback from conservative commentators and some media analysts who see it as another example of overreach in cultural criticism. One critic, reacting to the idea that a mermaid story could encode racial politics, scoffed, “But why was the first mermaid White, and why did she only become human when she left the sea?” That line, cited in a segment, captures the broader complaint that the Professors are reading too much into casting and character design. The same study has been folded into a wider political fight over campus culture, with a Harvard professor who criticized university DEI policies also pointing to the claim that animated Hollywood films promote White privilege and racist narratives, as noted in a recent discussion.
Behind the noise, there is a deeper body of scholarship that has been circling The Lion King for years. The broader Pride Lands research situates the film alongside California’s Proposition 187 and other flashpoints over immigration, arguing that its depiction of Scar’s hyena allies echoes racialized fears of invasion. A separate thread of criticism has labeled The Lion King “fascistic,” pointing to its obsession with bloodlines, its celebration of a single “chosen” ruler, and its visual language of massed animal crowds saluting the monarch, themes unpacked in a widely cited essay. On social media, a viral thread summarized the new study’s claim that Hollywood animated films promote White privilege, amplifying the debate far beyond academic circles, while a televised segment framed the research as “fantastically false.” In classrooms, though, some educators are quietly using scenes from The Lion King to spark conversations about race and power, a move reflected in a recorded teaching moment where a professor walks students through how the film encodes hierarchy. Whether parents buy the “White privilege” label or not, the fight over these movies is no longer just about nostalgia. It is about who gets to define what stories are for, and whose worldview they quietly serve.
More from Decluttering Mom: