On a quiet Long Island street in the mid‑1980s, 16‑year‑old Theresa Fusco vanished on her way home from work, and for decades her family lived with a brutal question mark. Now, investigators say a bit of trash from a smoothie shop, a straw tossed without a second thought, has finally tied a name to the DNA that haunted the case. The story is part science thriller, part cautionary tale about how the justice system can get it wrong before it gets it right.
The killing of the Long Island teen sat in cold‑case files for nearly 41 years while technology raced ahead and public pressure mounted. When the break finally came, it was not through a dramatic confession or a hidden witness, but through a discarded cup that let detectives quietly collect genetic material and match it to evidence from Theresa’s body.
The night Theresa vanished and a case goes sideways
Theresa Fusco was 16 when she disappeared after leaving her job at an ice cream parlor in Long Island, a routine walk that should have ended at home but instead ended with her body found in a wooded area, sexually assaulted and strangled. Authorities in suburban New York would later describe the crime as particularly vicious, charging that she was killed in the commission of first‑degree rape and leaving a community stunned that a teenager could be attacked so close to home.
In November 198, investigators were under intense pressure to find whoever had done this, and that pressure helped drive the case in a disastrous direction. Three young men were arrested and eventually convicted, even as physical evidence was thin and their confessions were later challenged as coerced, a sequence that would turn one of New York’s most notorious murder cases into one of its most infamous examples of wrongful conviction. What began as one of New York‘s hardest‑fought homicide prosecutions eventually became a testament to survival, solidarity, and systemic change as the men fought to clear their names.
Wrongful convictions unravel as Science catches up
Years after those convictions, Science finally caught up with the doubts that had been swirling around the case. DNA testing that was not available in the 1980s began to undercut the original narrative, showing that biological material from Theresa’s body did not match the three men who had been sent to prison, and that the real attacker was still unidentified. Science proved the innocence of three men who were found guilty of Theresa’s murder years earlier, but not before they spent 18 years behind bars and later brought a suit against the state, a painful arc that is now part of the broader story of Theresa and the people wrongly blamed for her death.
As those convictions unraveled, the district attorney’s office dismissed charges against two of the men, and the third was acquitted at retrial, a rare and public admission that the system had failed. A jury later awarded two of them damages for the years they lost, underscoring how deeply the original investigation had gone off course and how much weight courts now place on modern DNA evidence when it contradicts older, more subjective proof like confessions.
Othram, Forensic tech, and the mystery profile
Once the wrongful convictions were cleared, detectives were left with a cold case and a powerful new tool: a DNA profile from the real killer that had never been matched. Othram scientists successfully developed a DNA extract from the provided evidence and then used Forensic‑Grade Genome Sequencing to build a comprehensive DNA profile for the unknown suspect, a level of detail that allowed genealogical searching and family‑tree style analysis that would have been unthinkable in the 1980s. That work by Othram gave investigators a roadmap, but they still needed a fresh sample from a living person to confirm any lead.
Authorities spent months quietly watching a man named Richard Bilodeau, whose family connections and background had surfaced through that genealogical work. Investigators did not rush in; they waited for a clean opportunity to collect his DNA without tipping him off, a slow‑burn strategy that shows how modern cold‑case work often looks more like patient surveillance than dramatic raids. When the moment finally came, they were ready to grab it.
More from Decluttering Mom: