Jackson Duggar is finally saying out loud what many viewers only inferred from the edges of reality TV. The former 19 Kids & Counting star is talking about the strict discipline that shaped his childhood, and he is doing it in a way that sounds almost casual, which is exactly why fans are paying attention. By walking through how “encouragement” worked in the Duggar house, he is pulling back the curtain on a system that critics have been dissecting for years.
His new comments land in the middle of a broader family reckoning, as relatives share sharply different memories of what discipline looked like behind closed doors. Some, like Jackson, still defend the belief system that framed their upbringing. Others, including cousin Amy King and sister Jinger Duggar, are spelling out how those same tools felt frightening or shaming when they were kids.

Jackson’s relaxed reveal of “physical encouragement”
Jackson Duggar, who is listed among the younger sons in the sprawling Duggar family tree, recently sat down with his sister Jinger and started talking about discipline like it was just another household chore. During the conversation, he described how their mother Michelle used what he called physical “encouragement” when kids stepped out of line, a term that sounds gentle until listeners realize it is a stand-in for corporal punishment. In his telling, this was simply how things worked in a home with 19 children, a normal part of growing up that fit neatly into the family’s strict structure.
That framing is exactly what rattled a lot of people. As Jackson walked through how Michelle would administer that “encouragement,” critics on Reddit zeroed in on how relaxed he sounded about something they heard as violence. Commenters said they were struck by his calm description of what he endured behind closed doors, and some pointed out that his tone suggested he still saw it as loving discipline rather than harm. Coverage of the interview highlighted how Jackson’s choice of words, and his lack of obvious anger, left viewers debating whether he had fully processed what that kind of physical control might do to a child long term.
How “encouragement” fits into a broader Duggar discipline culture
Jackson’s story does not exist in a vacuum, and fans who have followed Duggar coverage for years recognized his language right away. Cousin Amy King has publicly talked about a similar script, explaining that adults in the family would literally tell her, “You need to come into the room, and we need to give you some encouragement,” when she was in trouble. She tied that phrase to what critics call blanket training, a method where a child is placed on a blanket and corrected, sometimes physically, every time they try to crawl off. Amy described that setup as a fear tactic that taught kids to obey because they were scared, not because they understood what they did wrong, and her comments helped connect Jackson’s mild tone to a much harsher discipline playbook.
Jinger Duggar has also been open about how the family’s rules shaped daily life for the younger kids. She has recalled siblings being so anxious about resources that they would grab their plate of food, hide it, and brace for the possibility that there might not be enough. That kind of scarcity mindset, paired with constant monitoring of behavior, created a home where obedience and self-denial were the default setting. When Jackson now talks about Michelle’s “encouragement,” it slots into a wider pattern of children who were trained to see strict control, whether through food, movement, or physical correction, as an expression of love. For critics, his calm delivery is not reassuring; it is evidence of how deeply that message took root.
Defending the belief system while the details spill out
Even as Jackson casually unpacks discipline, he is also stepping up as one of the most vocal defenders of the Duggar way of life. Earlier this year, he pushed back on people who describe the family as part of a cult, arguing that their connection to the Institute in Basic Life Principles was more limited than outsiders think. Jackson said the family went to the founder’s conferences once or twice a year and were involved in “whatever they did,” but insisted they were not part of everything the organization offered and that they relied on the Holy Spirit to guide them into truth. His comments, shared in coverage of his IBLP defense, framed the family as independent believers who borrowed from a system rather than being fully controlled by it.
More from Decluttering Mom:













