You will want clear, factual context before forming an opinion about this case. An independent review now examines whether police actions during a Las Vegas hostage incident — which left a 3‑year‑old dead and the child’s father also killed — followed department policy and law.
The post will lay out the known timeline, the officers’ account, and the family’s conflicting claims so you can see where facts align and where questions remain. Expect links to bodycam reports and local coverage that show the moments leading up to the shooting and what officials have released so far.
This piece will also explain how independent reviews work and what outcomes they can produce, helping you understand the stakes for the family, the police department, and community trust.
Key Facts of the Police Shooting and Hostage Crisis
Police responded to a domestic violence call that escalated into a hostage situation where a 3-year-old child and the child’s father were both shot and later died. Authorities released body-camera footage and said two officers fired when the father approached them armed while holding the child.
Timeline of the Incident
At 1:19 a.m., a woman placed a 911 call reporting that Quinton Baker had battered a friend and threatened to take her child from an apartment on South Maryland Parkway. Calls disconnected and resumed; dispatch told the caller officers were en route.
While officers were responding, investigators say Quinton fired two rounds at a car leaving the complex and then retreated into an apartment with the 3-year-old, later identified as Kentre Baker.
Body-camera video shows officers arriving, speaking with a woman who said Quinton pointed a gun at her and threatened to kill both her and the child. Quinton then walked down the apartment stairs with Kentre in his left arm and a gun pointed at the child’s chest. Officers issued verbal commands; the man did not comply. Officers say he fired five times as two officers returned fire. Both Quinton and Kentre were struck and later pronounced dead; one officer received a minor foot injury from a ricochet.
911 Calls and Initial Police Response
The first 911 call reported domestic violence and the suspect taking a child; that call cut out after about three minutes. A subsequent call again reported threats to kill the mother and her son, prompting the dispatch of officers from the Community Safety Division.
Dispatchers informed responding units of an active threat, including reports that the suspect had fired at a departing vehicle before barricading with the child. Officers staged and began to gather additional resources after confirming the suspect was armed and made explicit threats to the child.
Body-worn footage captured officers giving repeated verbal commands as the suspect exited the building holding the child. Officers say the suspect declared intent to kill himself and wanted to see the mother, creating an immediate risk to bystanders and responding personnel. Medical personnel were staged at the front of the complex; one officer ran with the wounded child toward those medics after the shooting.
Involved Individuals: Kentre Baker, Quinton Baker, and Raneka Pate
Kentre Baker, age 3, was the child taken hostage and later identified by the family as the boy who died at a hospital after being shot during the confrontation. Family members, including his mother Raneka Pate, have publicly disputed parts of the police account and sought answers about who fired the fatal shot.
Quinton Baker, 28, is the suspect police say battered a woman, fired at a vehicle, and then held his son as a hostage while armed. Police say Quinton fired multiple rounds during the encounter and sustained four gunshot wounds from officer gunfire; he died at the scene.
Raneka Pate, Kentre’s mother, initially contacted police and later spoke to media disputing the official narrative. She has questioned training and decisions made during the response, and family members have demanded an independent review into how officers handled the domestic violence call and hostage crisis.
For the police account and additional details, refer to reporting by local outlets such as the coverage of body-camera footage and the department’s briefing.
Conflicting Accounts and Ongoing Investigation
Accounts differ sharply about whether the suspect was armed, how many officers fired, and which shot killed the child. Officials say officers returned fire after the father allegedly pointed a handgun at the child and fired; the mother says he was unarmed and officers opened fire as he walked toward them carrying the boy.
Disputed Details About Weapons and Gunfire
Police statements contend the suspect exited the apartment holding the child and a firearm, then advanced toward officers while pointing the gun, prompting multiple officers to fire. Metro confirmed more than one officer discharged a weapon, but has not published an exact shot count. Neighbors reported hearing “a lot” of gunfire, corroborating multiple rounds were fired during the confrontation.
The child’s mother disputes that the father had a weapon when he left the unit. She says officers had guns drawn and shot as he walked toward them holding the child. Key questions remain: which rounds struck the child, whether any officer rounds hit the child, and whether the suspect fired a shot that killed his son. Those questions will hinge on ballistic analysis and wound-path reconstruction.
Police Body Camera Footage and Evidence
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department policy requires release of body-worn camera video in officer-involved shootings, and Metro planned a briefing with a frame-by-frame review. Body camera footage, ballistic reports, and forensic trajectory analysis will be central to determining sequence and source of shots. Investigators will compare timestamps, audio, muzzle flash, and spent casing locations to reconstruct who fired when.
Metro also collects witness statements and patrol video from nearby units. Forensic teams will test firearms for recent discharge and run ballistic matches on recovered projectiles and fragments. The outcome depends on clear visual and audio evidence; obscured angles, overlapping shots, and rapid movement can complicate definitive assignments of specific rounds to individual shooters.
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police’s Review Process
The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department opened an internal review and indicated investigators would present bodycam footage to the public, following department procedure. Metro typically conducts an internal use-of-force review while criminal investigators and the coroner perform ballistic and medical analyses. Separate oversight or independent review bodies may also examine officer conduct depending on findings.
Metro’s review will document officer identities, weapon discharge reports, training records, and incident timelines. It will aim to establish policy compliance, including whether de-escalation was attempted and whether commands were reasonable under the circumstances. The department said it would release additional details at a scheduled briefing and provide family access to footage before public release; those disclosures will shape next steps in any administrative or criminal inquiries.
More from Decluttering Mom:
