Sydney Sweeney’s big lingerie launch was supposed to be a flex, not a fiasco. Instead, the actor’s splashy Hollywood sign stunt has turned her new underwear brand into a lightning rod, with critics accusing her of disrespecting a landmark and chasing clout at any cost. The backlash is loud, but it is rooted in outrage and eye rolls, not in fans literally begging her to stop, a key distinction that matters as the fallout grows.
What actually happened is more straightforward and less melodramatic than the most breathless social posts suggest. Sweeney climbed up near the Hollywood sign, strung a line of bras across the hillside, and filmed the whole thing as a glossy promo for her label. The reaction that followed has been intense, but it is about an unauthorized commercial stunt and the optics around it, not a fan base on its knees pleading for mercy.
The Hollywood Sign Stunt That Lit The Fuse
The core of the controversy is simple: Sydney Sweeney and a production team hiked up toward the Hollywood sign in Los Angeles and used the area as a backdrop for a lingerie campaign. Video shows Sweeney near the iconic letters, with bras hanging on a makeshift clothesline, as cameras capture the moment for her new brand. According to reporting on the stunt, she scaled the hillside for an after dark shoot that was clearly designed to go viral and position the label as bold and irreverent, not safe or subtle, which is exactly what it did, just not in the way her team hoped.
The problem is that the Hollywood sign is not a free-for-all prop. The Hollywood Chamber of Commerce, which oversees commercial use of the landmark, has said that anyone intending to use the Hollywood Sign for commercial purposes must obtain a license, and that The Hollywood Chamber of Commerce did not grant a license or permission of any kind to the production associated with Sweeney’s bras. One report notes that, according to Jan at the Chamber, there was no permission granted for Sweeney and her crew to go that far up the hillside, and that the nonprofit Hollywood Sign Trust, which helps protect the site, was not involved in any approval either, leaving the whole shoot squarely in unauthorized territory.
What Officials Say About Permission And Possible Charges
Once the footage hit social media, the people who actually manage the sign moved quickly to distance themselves from the stunt. The Hollywood Chamber of Commerce confirmed that no approval was granted for Sweeney to scale the area around the sign or to hang anything on or near it, stressing that the Hollywood Sign for commercial purposes is tightly controlled and that Commerce rules require formal licensing. In one account, Jan, speaking on behalf of the Chamber, underscored that there was no permission granted to touch or climb the sign, a line that is central to how the city treats the hillside as protected space rather than a casual photo backdrop.
That lack of authorization is not just a bureaucratic detail, it is the basis for potential legal trouble. Media coverage has highlighted that Sweeney could face criminal trespass and vandalism charges for hanging a clothesline of bras near the Hollywood sign, since the area is fenced, monitored, and explicitly off limits to productions that have not gone through FilmLA and the Chamber. One report notes that Media outlets have theorised that Sweeney could face police investigation for trespass, and another cites officials who say they are still investigating how and under what authority, if any, the production accessed the site, with more information expected once that review is complete. As of now, there is no public record of charges being filed, but the possibility is clearly on the table.
Online Backlash, From Eye Rolls To Outrage
While the legal side plays out behind the scenes, the cultural verdict has been unfolding in real time on feeds and comment sections. Clips of Sydney Sweeney standing near the Hollywood sign with bras fluttering in the wind have been shared widely, with users calling the move “embarrassing honestly” and accusing the campaign of being more desperate than daring. One video recap notes that Sydney Sweeney is receiving public backlash for her unauthorized publicity stunt, with viewers zeroing in on the fact that she climbed the Hollywood hillside without permission and used it as a lingerie billboard, a choice many see as tone deaf rather than edgy.
The criticism has not been limited to the underwear brand itself. Sweeney’s broader commercial work has been dragged into the conversation, including her American Eagle “Good Jeans” campaign, which some online critics labeled “Nazi propaganda” because of the “jeans” and “genes” wordplay. That separate controversy, which also involved Sydney Sweeney and the Good Jeans tagline, has fed a narrative that her recent marketing choices keep tripping over cultural tripwires. Across platforms, the mood ranges from fans who still defend her as a hardworking actor to others who say the Hollywood stunt crossed a line, but the reporting describes backlash, outrage, and mockery, not a coordinated wave of fans literally begging her to shut the brand down.
How The Brand Launch Got Tangled In Hollywood Politics
Underneath the memes and snark is a more old fashioned Hollywood story about who gets to profit off the city’s most famous sign. The Hollywood Chamber of Commerce has long treated the sign as a controlled asset, and Jan has been clear that productions must go through formal channels to use it in ads. In Sweeney’s case, the Chamber has said that the lingerie shoot did not have a license, and that the organization did not grant permission for that production, which puts the brand launch at odds with the very people tasked with protecting the landmark. FilmLA, the body that typically handles permits, has not responded to questions about whether any application was filed, adding another layer of uncertainty to how the shoot was arranged.
That tension is why some coverage has framed the stunt as more than just a celebrity misstep. One analysis notes that anyone intending to use and depict the Hollywood sign must work with the Chamber and the nonprofit Hollywood Sign Trust, and that Sweeney’s team appears to have bypassed that process entirely. Another report points out that officials are still investigating how the crew accessed the site, suggesting that security protocols may have been skirted or exploited. For a brand that likely wanted to project confidence and control, being at the center of a permitting dispute with the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce is a rough way to start.
What This Means For Sydney Sweeney’s Image Going Forward
For Sydney Sweeney, the fallout lands at a delicate moment in her career, as she tries to balance prestige acting roles with a growing portfolio of endorsements and now a lingerie label. The Hollywood stunt was clearly meant to position her as a savvy founder who can turn a simple underwear drop into a cultural event, but the reaction has instead highlighted the gap between slick branding and local rules. Reports that Sydney Sweeney could be facing criminal trespass and vandalism charges, even if they never materialize, put legal language next to her name in a way that no publicist wants to see, especially when the underlying issue is an ad shoot that could have been staged almost anywhere else.
At the same time, the response has not been uniformly hostile. Some social media users have praised the visuals and shrugged off the rule breaking as classic Hollywood behavior, while others have focused on the broader pattern of celebrities pushing boundaries for attention. One account notes that there has been a mixed response online to the stunt, with some praising it and others sharing criticism, which tracks with how polarizing Sweeney’s recent campaigns have become. What the reporting does not show is fans literally begging her to stop making underwear or to pull the brand entirely; instead, it captures a noisy debate over taste, privilege, and how far a star can go in turning a city’s skyline into a personal billboard.
More from Decluttering Mom:
