Families with options are quietly rewriting the American map, packing moving trucks not just for better schools or cheaper mortgages, but because they are tired of worrying about what happens when their kids walk to the corner store. While national crime rates have eased in many categories, a cluster of big and mid‑sized cities is bucking that trend, and the result is a steady drip of residents heading for safer ground. The story of where they are going, and where they are leaving, says a lot about how crime, cost of living, and quality of life now intersect.
Instead of a single “crime wave,” what is emerging is a patchwork: some metros are seeing homicides and robberies climb again, while others are marketing their low crime stats as aggressively as they once pitched job growth. That tension is reshaping everything from coastal tech hubs to inland manufacturing towns, and it is pushing families to make hard choices about whether to stay and fight for their neighborhoods or call the movers.
Big‑city crime spikes that push people to the suburbs
In several large cities, the numbers are moving in the wrong direction just as residents thought things were stabilizing. Milwaukee is a stark example, with Homicides rising again after two straight years of declines, according to data from the MILWAUKEE Police Department. That kind of reversal hits families hard: parents who sat through community meetings and watched violence ebb now see headlines creeping back toward the worst years, and they start to wonder how long they can keep rolling the dice on their block.
Other cities are seeing similar pressure points, even as national averages improve. A survey of major city departments found that places like Columbus reported increases in robbery and aggravated assault, while Tampa recorded higher rape numbers and Wichita saw year‑over‑year jumps in both homicide and robbery, all cutting against the broader national trend. Pittsburgh, too, reported increases in rape even as overall crime totals declined, underscoring how specific categories can drive fear even when the big picture looks better, and those localized spikes are helping explain why some residents are eyeing the exits from these major cities.
Chicago, San Francisco and the “I’m done” moment
For some metros, the tipping point is not just violent incidents, but the grind of everyday property crime layered on top of high costs. In Chicago, Property crime has risen 34.7% since 2020, and violent crime 3.8%, a combination that wears people down even if they are not personally victimized. As the nation’s third‑largest metro area balances a downtown revival with stubborn neighborhood inequities, those figures translate into more car break‑ins, more package thefts, and more parents rethinking whether their kids can safely take public transit home from practice.
On the West Coast, San Francisco is dealing with a different but related exodus. The city is one of the places with the steepest outward net migration rates, with its once‑booming technology sector now sharing the blame with quality‑of‑life concerns. Residents cite street disorder and safety worries alongside rising housing costs and rentals as reasons to go, and those factors are helping push people out of San Francisco and other expensive coastal hubs. When a family is paying top‑tier rent but still feels the need for cameras on every window, the math on staying starts to fall apart.
Where families are going instead
As crime and cost frustrations build in big metros, families are not just scattering randomly, they are clustering in a new set of “safe enough” destinations. A detailed look at moving patterns shows that Top Cities People Are Moving to in 2025 include Myrtle Beach, SC/Wilmington, NC and Ocala, FL, all places that promise a slower pace, more space, and a perception of lower crime than the cities many newcomers are leaving. These communities are not crime‑free, but they offer a tradeoff that feels better to parents who want their kids’ biggest worry to be a sunburn, not a stray bullet.
Zooming out, the same pattern shows up in broader migration rankings. Florida in particular is soaking up new arrivals, with Fort Lauderdale, St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, Panama City, North Fort Myers, Leesburg, Sarasota and St. Cloud all making lists of top inbound markets as people chase both safety and sunshine. At the same time, a separate ranking of the Safest Places to Live in the U.S. in 2025‑2026 highlights Johns Creek, GA, Centreville, VA, Newton, MA and Rochester Hills, MI, underscoring how suburban and smaller‑city options around major metros are becoming magnets for those who want access to big‑city jobs without big‑city crime.
The “safer city” boom and the Great American Migration
Crime is not the only factor driving what some real‑estate agents are calling the Great American Migration, but it is increasingly part of the sales pitch. A frequently asked section on one relocation guide bluntly addresses Which cities are losing the most residents in 2025, pointing to large metros with populations of more than 500,000 people that are shedding households. Many of those outbound residents are landing on Florida’s Gulf Coast, where lower taxes, beaches and a reputation for safer neighborhoods combine into a powerful draw for families who feel squeezed in their current city.
National search data backs up the idea that safety is now a front‑of‑mind filter. One analysis of relocation interest found that 73% of 2025’s most searched relocation cities are safer due to falling crime rates, with both top move‑to destinations and emerging “second tier” markets seeing crime drop even as their populations grow. That means families are not just chasing cheap houses, they are actively seeking out safer cities where they believe their kids can walk to school or ride bikes without constant supervision, even if that means moving across the country.
Sun Belt winners, tech hubs and the safety calculus
Beyond individual cities, entire regions are reshaping around this safety calculus. A breakdown of top migration states notes that people are flocking to places like Austin, with one guide bluntly stating, “Where are people also relocating? Austin. Because of its booming IT sector, lively live music scene, and lack of state income tax.” That mix of economic opportunity and lifestyle perks is especially attractive to families leaving high‑crime, high‑cost metros such as Los Angeles, where rising housing costs and rentals, along with safety concerns, are influencing decisions to relocate.
Smaller metros are getting in on the action too, often by pairing growth with a relatively low crime profile. A ranking of the fastest‑growing places in the U.S. in 2025‑2026 highlights Wildwood, Florida, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina and Leander, Texas, all communities that sell a family‑friendly image alongside new construction and job growth. Meanwhile, another list of crime‑stopper cities points to Regardless of move‑to popularity, places like El Paso, Texas, Lubbock, Texas and Worcester are seeing more people interested in moving in than out, in part because they are perceived as safer alternatives to the big‑city grind.
Can policing strategies keep families from leaving?
City leaders are not blind to the connection between crime and moving trucks, and some are betting that targeted policing can help stem the outflow. A large body of research on Violent crime shows that a small number of hot spots can generate outsized influences on citywide violence trends, and that focusing officers and resources on those blocks can reduce shootings and assaults without blanketing entire neighborhoods in heavy enforcement. That kind of “surgical” approach is appealing to mayors who want to show progress on safety without driving away residents with aggressive tactics.
Still, even the best strategy on paper has to compete with the lived experience of residents who have already watched crime ebb and flow. When parents in MILWAUKEE see Homicides tick back up, or when Chicagoans hear that violent crime is up 3.8% with property incidents up a whopping 34.7%, faith in long‑term fixes can be hard to sustain. That is how a city loses not just residents, but the very families who might otherwise have been its most committed advocates, and it is why the next few years of crime policy and neighborhood investment will do a lot to determine which places keep their people and which ones watch them drive away.
More from Decluttering Mom:
