The story that has been spilling out in a Virginia courtroom sounds like something out of a prestige crime drama, except every detail is real and every consequence is permanent. A young nanny from Brazil, a suburban husband, and a carefully staged alibi collided with jealousy and fear, and prosecutors say the fallout left two people dead in a Herndon home. At the center of it all is the nanny’s own account of an affair, a cover story, and a night that, by her telling, spiraled from planning into bloodshed.
The affair, the alibi, and a plan that curdled
By the time police were called to the northern Virginia suburb of Herndon, the family at the heart of the case had already been living with a secret. The live-in babysitter from Brazil, identified as Juliana Peres Magalhaes, has testified that she and the husband, Brendan Banfield, were romantically involved while she worked as an au pair caring for the couple’s young daughter. In court, she described how that relationship evolved into a plot, with prosecutors arguing that Brendan Banfield wanted his wife, Christine Banfield, out of the way and was willing to use their nanny and a stranger to make it happen, a theory that has been laid out in detail in The Brief.
According to the nanny’s testimony, the plan hinged on an alibi that would make the violence look like a home invasion gone wrong rather than a domestic ambush. Reporting on the case describes how prosecutors say Both the au pair and husband were arrested between 2023 and 2024 and initially handed murder charges, with Brendan Banfield now on trial in Fairfax County Circuit Court while his former employee appears as the state’s key witness. In September, she entered a plea to a lesser count, a move that has sharpened scrutiny on her motives as she recounts how the alleged alibi was supposed to shield Brendan Banfield from suspicion and instead left him accused of a double homicide in the Virginia case.
Inside the bedroom: a stranger, a wife, and a night of violence
What happened inside the Banfield master bedroom is now being relived in graphic detail for jurors. Magalhaes has told the court that a man she did not previously know, identified as Joseph Ryan, was lured to the house and ended up in that room with Christine Banfield before the situation turned deadly. She testified that she crouched behind the bed and covered her eyes and ears while Brendan Banfield repeatedly stabbed his wife, an account that prosecutors say explains why both Christine Banfield and Joseph Ryan were found dead in the same upstairs space, and that is now central to the state’s theory of how the double murder unfolded.
Detectives have filled in the physical picture around that testimony. Fairfax County Sgt. Kenner Fortner told jurors that when he first processed the scene, the master bedroom still bore the marks of a family home shared by Christine Banfield and her husband, but when he returned months later, the space looked very different. Photos showed that the nanny had moved into the room, taking the slain wife’s place in the bed and in the daily rhythms of the house, a detail that prosecutors highlighted through Fortner’s account of the Fairfax County Sgt visit.
That unsettling shift from employee to de facto partner is part of why the case has drawn so much attention. Earlier coverage noted that investigators soon realized the nanny and husband were not just colleagues but lovers, and that the crime scene itself, described as an appalling tableau, suggested a level of rage and planning that went far beyond a chaotic break-in. The fact that the same room where Christine Banfield and Joseph Ryan died later became the nanny’s sleeping quarters has been used by investigators to illustrate how thoroughly the old family structure had been erased, a point underscored in accounts of how Investigators reconstructed the Virginia home’s transformation.
Letters, loyalties, and a witness under the microscope
Even before she took the stand, Magalhaes’ own words were already in evidence. From jail, she wrote letters that prosecutors say reveal a woman torn between protecting herself and protecting the man she once called a partner. Those notes, described in court as emotional and sometimes contradictory, show her wrestling with how much responsibility to place on Brendan Banfield and how much to shoulder herself, a tension that has become a key subplot in the Virginia nanny saga.
Those same letters are now being used to test her credibility in front of jurors. Prosecutors have leaned on her as their star witness, but defense lawyers have seized on every inconsistency, pointing to her plea deal and her shifting tone about Brendan Banfield as reasons to doubt her story. Coverage of the trial has noted that she has already pleaded guilty to manslaughter in connection with the killings and has been behind bars since her arrest, a status that frames every answer she gives about the night of the stabbings and the months of planning that preceded them, as detailed in accounts of the guilty plea.
More from Decluttering Mom:
