One volunteer was caught off guard when the head of communications for her local organization approached her with unexpected feedback during an event. After making reminder phone calls to subscribers, she learned that some recipients described her communication style as “off-putting” and “strange.” The conversation left her unsettled, particularly since she was confident in her ability to handle phone calls and had prior experience in similar roles.
For about a year, the volunteer had been actively engaged with the organization, which hosted various public events. Prior to the latest gathering, she took the initiative to reach out to subscribers, using a standard script provided by the organization. With her background conducting interviews and interacting with people, she thought she was well-prepared for the task. She made around 20 calls, managing to leave messages for most but also engaging in a few brief, pleasant conversations where people expressed gratitude for the information.
However, during the event, she received surprising feedback from the head of communications. This person inquired whether the volunteer had felt nervous or uncertain during her calls. When the volunteer asked for specific examples of the criticism, the head explained that anonymity prevented her from sharing details. Instead, she suggested that the volunteer might benefit from some training in communication skills, which felt dismissive to the volunteer.
The feedback came as a shock, as the volunteer had not encountered negative reactions during her calls. Instead of constructive criticism, the suggestions felt contradictive to her self-assuredness in dealing with people. She found it insulting to imply that she needed additional training for something she had done successfully in her professional life for years.
People had very different reactions to this situation on Reddit. Some thought the feedback could stem from a misunderstanding, suggesting that perhaps the subscribers might interpret her tone differently than intended. Others pointed out that sometimes, the feedback might reflect the individual preferences of the subscribers rather than a genuine flaw in her communication style. A few commenters emphasized that volunteers should feel confident and supported in their roles, asserting that negative criticisms shouldn’t deter someone from helping out.
As the volunteer navigated this feedback, she began to contemplate whether she should continue her involvement with the organization, leaning heavily towards quitting. The idea of being perceived as off-putting stood out as particularly troubling. Critics suggested stepping back from what felt like a judgmental environment. After all, volunteering should be a rewarding experience, not one that carries unnecessary negativity.
Some readers expressed empathy, sharing that they had experienced similar situations. They noted that it can be difficult to receive feedback that feels completely unfounded, especially when one is confident in their abilities. The general sentiment was that everyone should feel comfortable in their volunteering roles without fear of harsh criticism.
However, others suggested a more constructive approach. They pointed out that a conversation with the head of communications could clarify the feedback and possibly lead to a better understanding of any miscommunication. This would provide a chance to adjust and grow, rather than quitting outright. Still, the volunteer felt that the suggestion of training in an area she already excelled in felt patronizing and out of place.
As the volunteer weighed her options, it raised the question of how feedback should be approached in non-professional settings. Should volunteering environments maintain the same standards as workplaces? Or should there be more leniency for those just trying to lend a helping hand? Ultimately, leaving the organization might feel like an escape from judgment, but it could also close the door to potential growth.
More from Decluttering Mom:
