Some custody fights are about schedules, boundaries, and hurt feelings after a death. This one is something much darker.
A Rhode Island father is asking the court to block his late wife’s parents from getting access to his young daughter, not because of ordinary family tension, but because he says they are the very people who helped take his wife from them in the first place.
That is the heartbreaking fight now surrounding Scott Naso, his 4-year-old daughter Laila, and the parents of his late wife, Shahrzad “Sherry” Naso.
He Says This Stopped Being a Grandparents’ Rights Case a Long Time Ago
Scott Naso has been speaking publicly about the case, saying his wife’s parents took him to family court just two months after Sherry died from metastatic breast cancer in 2024, asking for grandparent visitation.
On paper, that sounds like one kind of case.
But in Scott’s telling, this is not about grieving grandparents trying to stay connected to their granddaughter. It is about whether the people he blames for his wife’s death should be allowed around his child at all.
And that is what makes the story so explosive.
Because once a father stands in court and says, in effect, these are the people who cost my daughter her mother, the entire fight changes shape.
View this post on Instagram
The Allegations Go Far Beyond Family Conflict
Scott claims his in-laws, both doctors, prescribed medication to Sherry without coordinating with her oncology team and that their actions masked warning signs while her cancer worsened.
He has also accused them of exerting unhealthy control over his wife throughout her illness.
Those are serious allegations, and they remain allegations. Sherry’s parents deny wrongdoing.
Still, the details Scott has described are the kind that instantly make this case feel bigger than a dispute over visitation. He is not just arguing that the relationship is strained or that emotions are running high after a tragic loss. He is arguing that contact with Laila could place her in danger too.
That fear seems to be rooted in one moment he says he will never forget: the day his wife died, he alleges he found Sherry’s parents holding Laila down and giving her medication without his consent. Her grandfather has reportedly said he believed the child had croup and gave prednisone.
That incident appears to be a major reason Scott says this is about protection, not punishment.
View this post on Instagram
The Court Battle Is Already Dragging On
The legal fight has been going for months.
A Rhode Island court granted Sherry’s parents supervised visitation with Laila in October 2024, but that arrangement ended in January 2025. Since then, the battle has continued, with Scott trying to convince the court that ongoing contact is not in his daughter’s best interest.
And it does not sound like this will end quickly.
His attorney has reportedly said the case could continue through appeals no matter who wins, which means this little girl’s future may stay tied up in litigation for a long time.
The Real Tragedy Is What Laila Has Already Lost
That may be the part that sits heaviest in all of this.
At the center of the case is a 4-year-old who already lost her mother. Instead of being surrounded by adults united in grief and love, she is now at the center of a deeply bitter fight over blame, trust, and whether the people who loved her mother should be allowed in her life at all.
And that is why this story hits so hard.
Not because it is dramatic, but because it asks one impossible question after another: What does justice look like when a family believes medical wrongdoing happened inside the family itself? And how does a court decide what is safest for a child when the people fighting over her are also fighting over the meaning of her mother’s death?
More from Decluttering Mom:
